- From: Barry McMullin <mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:50:52 +0100 (IST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- cc: mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie
Hi Folks - I am frequently asked (challenged?) to identify web sites which demonstrate "best practice" in accessible design. I should emphasise that what I have in mind here are sites that are authentic (i.e., they provide some genuine, useful, service, rather than being "toy" demonstrations), and that exemplify "inclusive" design - i.e., that are "good" across multiple criteria and for many distinct user groups - including, but in no way limited to, those with a variety of disabilities. Ideally I would like sites which demonstrate that, in general, there is no absolute or inherent conflict between accessibility and other typical design objectives (specifically including visual aesthetics, interactivity, etc.). I am certainly not looking for a single "best" site, but rather a collection or portfolio of exemplars that collectively cover a variety of typical categories of web site or service. I have had a quick search through the wai-ig list archives, the W3C WAI resources, and google, with pretty limited success. Perhaps the closest resource to what I am talking about would be the site for the RNIB "See it Right" awards: http://www.rnib.org.uk//digital/siraccess/ This is useful, but also has a number of limitations for my purposes. So if people have any relevant links - either to archived discussion on this forum, or to other resources elsewhere (such as a good "web accessibility hall of fame"), then they would be much appreciated. In any case, I would welcome any suggestions from this group as to your own current favorite nominations - perhaps with brief commentary on why you pick them out. (But please note that I am definitely not looking for examples of bad or inaccessible design - I'm afraid I have no shortage of those...) Many thanks, - Barry. --
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 09:50:54 UTC