- From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:21:47 +0800
- To: "'David Woolley'" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I would rather think the real difference is: Level A...neglect of these will definitely prevent some users from accessing the site. Level B...neglect of these may cause the site to be hard to access for some or may take an unreasonable time. Level C..Neglect of these probably will not stop a user or delay him/her greatly but will detract from the site. Harry Woodrow -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Woolley Sent: Tuesday, 13 August 2002 2:50 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: 508 vs. W3C > Incidentally, if any list member would like to explain to me what > diference in terms of accessibility is between the various compliance The real difference is in acceptability to commercial web designers. 1 should cause no real hardship; 2 will limit their scope somewhat; 3 tends to rule out a lot of what they want to do in terms of presentation. --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 2/08/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 2/08/2002
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 04:22:22 UTC