- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:55:59 -0400
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>
- Cc: Lynn Alford <lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
no, one is good grammar and the other is not. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com> To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>; "Matt May" <mcmay@w3.org> Cc: "Lynn Alford" <lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:49 PM Subject: Re: onclick vs Re: Click here At 11:43 AM -0400 8/9/02, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Saying 'click here' to a speech-input user is a little like saying "do you >see?" to a person who is blind. It isn't quite appropriate. But beyond >upsetting them you will probably get your meaning across. And I've heard (or read) many blind people using English idioms that refer to sight. It's like claiming that saying "see you later!" is an accessibility problem. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Next Book: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 http://cssin24hours.com Kynn on Web Accessibility ->> http://kynn.com/+sitepoint
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2002 12:57:26 UTC