- From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:57:53 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Just checked the XHTML 2.0 draft. No IMG, no LONGDESC, and no > XLink. So, wow, I guess they didn't get it right! :) Well no <img/> is clearly a good thing, or at least would be if browser support for <object> wasn't so terrible. For backwards compatibility we could use <img src="blah.png" alt="whatever" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />. I wonder whether xhtml-legacy-redecl-1.mod will include such an element. The lack of explicit support for xlink is disappointing, and I can't help thinking that use of xlink should have happened before use of xforms given how much simpler a move to xlink will be for most elements (if we keep src and href around for a while, like the dual use of lang and xml:lang in XHTML1.0).
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 06:56:50 UTC