- From: Brian Walk <N10BKW1@wpo.cso.niu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 15:14:46 -0500
- To: "<"<w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <sd4fe7f1.021@wpo.cso.niu.edu>
Hello all. I am an interface designer working with the eLearning Services group at Northern Illinois University. As such, I have been charged with understanding as much as I can about Section 508 and making sure we apply it to all of our products as necessary (some of our clients do not legally require it, however, I am trying to establish it as part of our "best practices." A little background. I am a graphic designer by trade, but I have become more of a Web designer over the past few years, and am comfortable with a moderate level of programming (we have other real programmers on staff). And, contrary to some of the dialogues I have witnessed here which might cause some of you to pre-judge me, I have fully embraced the concepts of accessability and usability in Web design as being as if not more important than a trendy, cutting edge, complicated or unintuitive design that tends to serve it's creator(s) more than it's intended audience. That out of the way, I need to make some recommendations on a project we are working on. Our instructional designers are developing a 15-module course designed to teach people with little or no employment experience learn skill sets (computer, social, and otherwise) to help them someday get and hold on to better paying jobs. Some of the activities in the course are comprised of form-type pages in which the user selects appropriate check boxes and submits their responses. Others are more visual activities. One, for example, is a drag and drop exercise in which the user is presented with two statements, and must match a "true" icon and a "false" icon appropriately. Now, obviously, drag and drop exercises fail on at least two accounts, by (a) requiring the user and see the options available, and (b) can manipulate the correct icon to the correct position on the screen via a mouse ( I don't know of any keyboard equivalents for moving elements across a screen, if even to locate and select them). There may be more failures intrinsic to this type of activity that go beyond what I have mentioned here, but I cannot think of any that are more pressing issues! My role in this project is not only to provide them with a usable and accessible interface in which to house all of these activities, but also supporting graphics, and, as I mentioned previously, make recommendations to keep us within the regulations of Section 508. My first suggestion for this type of exercise would be to provide and optional form-based version of the exercise, in which, using the example above, both statements might include a radio button or check box for each possible answer (all HTML-based and screen reader friendly, of course!), and require the user to set the correct answers for each in order to complete the exercise. This seems like a quick-fix, no-brainer, but I wonder if any of you might have any thoughts contrary or suggestions of something better. I would love to send you all a link to show you all the exercise in question, but at the moment, it isn't allowed. If you would like to help, but need more information, I will be happy to answer any specific questions you may have. By the way, the drag and drop exercises were produced using Coursebuilder from Macromedia. Macromedia, if you are listening, feel free to chime in! Thanks in advance to all Brian Walk Lead Interface/Graphic Designer eLearning Services Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL 60115 (815)753-6916 www.learn.niu.edu
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: Brian_Walk.vcf
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2002 16:15:00 UTC