- From: Simon White <simon.white@jkd.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:41:02 +0100
- To: "Steve Vosloo" <stevenvosloo@yahoo.com>, "WAI IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Dear Steve, The skip navigation link does not need to be invisible as it is a help to many users, not just those with screenreaders. This topic was covered a while ago on this list and you might find an answer to your questions from the archive: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/ - general archive that can be searched The actual topic is available from here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2001AprJun/0051.html There are also many other threads on this most debated subject but they are too numerous to list here. As for the other question you posed, I don't know so I'll leave that up to someone who can answer it with authority. I hope that you get something from this. Kind regards Simon -----Original Message----- From: Steve Vosloo [mailto:stevenvosloo@yahoo.com] Sent: 23 July 2002 14:32 To: WAI IG Subject: Invisible "Skip navigation" link What is the best way to code an invisible Skip Nav link? <a href="#content"> <img src="spacer.gif" alt="Skip navigation." width="1" height="1" border="0"> </A> Does the <A> need a title with "Skip navigation." link too? And while I'm here, does anyone know why many examples for accessible links provide a space after a description? And around an "=" sign, e.g. <a href="#content" accesskey="2" title="Skip Navigation. Access key = 2. "> Skip Navigation </a> Thanks Steve Steve Vosloo Division Manager Usability Junction Tel: + 27 (0) 21 409 7961 Fax: + 27 (0) 21 409 7050 Cell: + 27 (0) 83 463 0012 Web: www.usabilityjunction.com _____________________________________________________________________ VirusChecked by the Incepta Group plc _____________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 09:41:05 UTC