RE: non-sgml characters

> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Jon Hanna wrote:
>
> > > >       (™)
> >
> > This is a valid way of constructing a character set, as long as
> one doesn't
> > claim to be using Latin-1 etc.

No, I certainly did not. I in no way implied that nonsense like ™ had
any validity or meaning.

Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 13:29:23 UTC