w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from April to June 2002 by date

Monday, 1 July 2002

• Re: Accessible _content_ management David Poehlman
• Re: Accessible _content_ management Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 30 June 2002

• Senate Inquiry into education of students with disabilities (Australia). Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au
• Re: deque systems? Access Systems
• RE: Accessible _content_ management Michael R. Burks

Saturday, 29 June 2002

• Java (Re: deque systems?) Nick Kew
• Re: Accessible _content_ management kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Accessible _content_ management Charles McCathieNevile
• deque systems? David Poehlman
• Re: Accessible _content_ management David Poehlman
• Re: Accessible _content_ management Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: onfocus-onmouseover xhtml Jim Ley
• Re: onfocus-onmouseover xhtml David Woolley
• Re: Accessible _content_ management David Poehlman
• Re: Accessible _content_ management David Poehlman

Friday, 28 June 2002

• onfocus-onmouseover xhtml jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Accessible _content_ management Jon Hanna
• RE: Accessible _content_ management Asif
• IWA Italy Accessibility Project Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Accessible _content_ management Kynn Bartlett
• Fw: Course on repairing web pages David Poehlman
• RE: OBJECT tag and the IE Jukka Korpela
• Re: OBJECT tag and the IE Access Systems

Thursday, 27 June 2002

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ kk@w3.org
• Re: OBJECT tag and the IE Tom Gilder
• OBJECT tag and the IE Ruben Arrizabalaga
• Fw: Gnome 2.0 Released! David Poehlman
• RE: Server Side Include Accessibility Jon Hanna
• Re: Server Side Include Accessibility Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: Server Side Include Accessibility Al Gilman
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) Andrew McFarland
• Server Side Include Accessibility Kirsten Williams
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) Chris Croome
• RE: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web c on tact management solution request:) Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web con tact management solution request:) Andrew McFarland
• RE: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web con tact management solution request:) Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) Andrew McFarland
• RE: accessible web contact management solution request: Scarlett Julian (ED)

Wednesday, 26 June 2002

• Re: accessible web contact management solution request: David Poehlman
• [OT] Betsie Security Bugfix Release Version 1.5.12 Wayne Myers
• RE: accessible web contact management solution request: Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Fw: accessible web contact management solution request: David Poehlman

Tuesday, 25 June 2002

• RE: RE: German accessibility legislation Cynthia Waddell
• RE: RE: German accessibility legislation Simon White
• Re: RE: German accessibility legislation Martin Sloan
• Re: RE: German accessibility legislation Martin Sloan
• RE: Fw: JAWS and Web forms Kelly Ford
• Re: Fw: JAWS and Web forms Jean-Marie D'Amour
• European Union accessibility legislation update Simon White
• Fw: JAWS and Web forms David Poehlman
• RE: German accessibility legislation Michael R. Burks
• RE: Labels in Netscape Andrew Johns

Monday, 24 June 2002

• Re: Labels in Netscape David Woolley
• RE: German accessibility legislation Patrick Burke
• Re: German accessibility legislation Gregor Wolbring
• Re: German accessibility legislation Jens Peter
• Re: Labels in Netscape Bill Mason
• RE: German accessibility legislation Simon White
• Re: German accessibility legislation Gregor Wolbring
• RE: German accessibility legislation Simon White
• Re: German accessibility legislation Demonpenta2@aol.com
• German accessibility legislation Simon White
• Labels in Netscape Andrew Johns
• RE: Accessibility Valet Jukka Korpela
• New Accessibility Tools for Microsoft Office Robert B. Yonaitis

Sunday, 23 June 2002

• Online bibliography for research project phoenixl
• [OT] W3C-validator Ineke van der Maat

Friday, 21 June 2002

• Accessibility Valet Nick Kew
• Accessibility article on BBC News Online Tom Gilder
• Fwd: [RNIBCampaignforGoodWebDesign] RNIB Look Louder game: RNIB statement 21 June 2002, 15:30 hours Aaron Smith
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Simon White
• Re: aural supplementation for minority language pages David Woolley

Thursday, 20 June 2002

• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people David Woolley
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? David Woolley
• RE: aural supplementation for minority language pages Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: aural supplementation for minority language pages Jukka Korpela
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Andrew Johns
• Re: aural supplementation for minority language pages Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? Charles McCathieNevile
• aural supplementation for minority language pages Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? Jukka Korpela
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? David Woolley

Wednesday, 19 June 2002

• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Jim Tobias
• Re: ASP.NET Tom Gilder
• RE: ASP.NET Jon Hanna
• Re: ASP.NET Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? Charles McCathieNevile
• ASP.NET Asif
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? David Woolley
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? David Woolley
• Re: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Tom Gilder
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Nissen, Dan E
• Re: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Tom Gilder
• RE: pdf as text?? Glenda Watson Hyatt
• Re: Fwd: RE: (Access-UK) - totally astounding Nick Kew
• Fwd: RE: (Access-UK) - totally astounding Aaron Smith
• Online Course on Web Accessibility in July Kynn Bartlett
• media:Fw: Blind People Can't Read Flash David Poehlman
• RE: pdf as text?? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Bill Mason
• Re: pdf as text?? Joel Ward
• Re: pdf as text?? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: pdf as text?? Jerry Weichbrodt
• media:Fw: Microsoft Drops Java Support David Poehlman
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility RUST Randal
• Poll results so far... Simon White
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Simon White
• Re: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility Jon Hanna
• RE: pdf as text?? Jason Megginson
• Interesting Poll on Accessibility Simon White
• RE: pdf as text?? Jon Hanna
• RE: pdf as text?? Access Systems
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Jon Hanna
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Jon Hanna
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? RUST Randal
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? RUST Randal
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Jukka Korpela
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Andrew Johns
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? RUST Randal
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? RUST Randal
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Tom James
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Jon Hanna
• Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? Jukka Korpela
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Andrew Johns
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Jukka Korpela
• Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? Andrew Johns
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Simon White

Tuesday, 18 June 2002

• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Andrew Johns
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Nick Kew
• RE: Site Check - http://www.baycoroad.org/ Hillary K. Norfleet
• RE: Site Check - http://www.baycoroad.org/ Hillary K. Norfleet
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Andrew Johns
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Jim Ley
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Jon Hanna
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility John Foliot - bytown internet
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility John Foliot - bytown internet
• Site Check - http://www.baycoroad.org/ Hillary K. Norfleet
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Nissen, Dan E
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Jon Hanna
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Jim Ley
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Tom Gilder
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility David Poehlman
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Andrew McFarland
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility John Morse
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Andrew Johns
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Tom Gilder
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Andrew McFarland
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Alan Chuter
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Simon White
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility jonathan chetwynd
• HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility Simon White
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> David Woolley
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> David Woolley
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> jonathan chetwynd

Monday, 17 June 2002

• Re: <a href="" meta=""> David Woolley
• Re: Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color Leslie K. Yoder
• Re: Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color Kathleen Anderson
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color Charles McCathieNevile
• Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color Alan Chuter
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> David Woolley

Sunday, 16 June 2002

• <a href="" meta=""> jonathan chetwynd
• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 fV4F64fHcWUZ4Ajtnkg6LV ezgo@w3.org

Saturday, 15 June 2002

• Accessible movies in the _Star_ Joe Clark

Friday, 14 June 2002

• Newspapers and weblogs; XML and academia Joe Clark
• Usability and Accessibility presentation RE: WebXTutti Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing John Foliot - bytown internet
• RE: FYI - Online HTML viewers SHARPE, Ian
• RE: table captions Jukka Korpela

Thursday, 13 June 2002

• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing - Timers phoenixl
• Re: FYI - Online HTML viewers Nick Kew
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing - Timers Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: 30 days to a more accessible Weblog Joe Clark
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing phoenixl
• RE: Educational Technology Journal -- accessibility edition Dana Louise Simberkoff
• table captions RUST Randal
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing phoenixl
• Another Important Note re:Usability / Accessibility Testing Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing Robert B. Yonaitis
• FYI - Online HTML viewers SHARPE, Ian
• SVG List Accessibility Thread David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility & Usability Testing phoenixl

Wednesday, 12 June 2002

• Announcement-AccVerify Usability Visual Test Manager Dana Louise Simberkoff
• image and font scaling jonathan chetwynd

Tuesday, 11 June 2002

• Fw: Educational Technology Journal -- accessibility edition David Poehlman
• Re: 30 days to a more accessible Weblog David Poehlman
• RE: 30 days to a more accessible Weblog Jérôme Ernu
• Tone and language Judy Brewer
• 30 days to a more accessible Weblog Joe Clark

Monday, 10 June 2002

• An accessible site for the World Cup Soccer Matches Michael R. Burks
• Accessibility & Usability Testing Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: Interesting Article in the NY Times Leslie K. Yoder
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Nissen, Dan E
• RE: Interesting Article in the NY Times Simon White
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Charles McCathieNevile
• Interesting Article in the NY Times Michael R. Burks
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Jukka Korpela
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Nissen, Dan E
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 7 June 2002

• media:Connecticut to Enforce Accessibility Guidelines David Poehlman
• Flash compliance Simon White
• RE: Accessibility lawsuit Shawn Lawton Henry
• Fw: Review of Hal, Window-Eyes and JAWS for Windows David Poehlman

Thursday, 6 June 2002

• RE: Accessibility lawsuit Shawn Lawton Henry
• Re: CSS percentage sizing Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Open Beta: Testing & Reporting on Accessibility & Usability of Applications David Poehlman

Wednesday, 5 June 2002

• Re: CSS percentage sizing David Woolley
• Open Beta: Testing & Reporting on Accessibility & Usability of Applications Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: Accessibility lawsuit Tom Gilder
• Accessibility lawsuit Jérôme Ernu
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Jérôme Ernu
• CSS percentage sizing SHARPE, Ian

Tuesday, 4 June 2002

• Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman

Monday, 3 June 2002

• RE: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML Nick Kew
• Re: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML David Woolley
• Re: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML Nick Kew
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• RE: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML Jukka Korpela
• Re: Guideline on avoiding visual language? David Poehlman
• RE: Guideline on avoiding visual language? Jukka Korpela
• RE: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML Harry Woodrow
• Re: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML Kelly Ford

Sunday, 2 June 2002

• Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML Nick Kew

Saturday, 1 June 2002

• objectionable language retraction: David Poehlman
• Re: Guideline on avoiding visual language? David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone kestrell
• Guideline on avoiding visual language? Tom Gilder

Friday, 31 May 2002

• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: OT: lynx config problems with firewall David Woolley
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Steven McCaffrey
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Nissen, Dan E
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• OT: lynx config problems with firewall Scarlett Julian (ED)

Thursday, 30 May 2002

• Re: US Politics: Bush to Dismantle Digital Divide Projects Demonpenta2@aol.com
• US Politics: Bush to Dismantle Digital Divide Projects Kynn Bartlett
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• RE: Time and Accessibility Nissen, Dan E
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phoenixl
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Windows xp Screen reader David Poehlman
• Re: Windows xp Screen reader jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman

Wednesday, 29 May 2002

• Re: Page validation (was RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone) Phill Jenkins
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone - Usability Phill Jenkins

Thursday, 30 May 2002

• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Windows xp Screen reader David Poehlman
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Jon Hanna
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone John Foliot - bytown internet
• Windows xp Screen reader jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone) phoenixl
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone Access Systems
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone - Usability phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl

Wednesday, 29 May 2002

• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Patrick Burke
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Page validation (was RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone) Nick Kew
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Nick Kew
• oops, we need a new guideline in wcag 2.0: David Poehlman
• Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone) Jon Hanna
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Jerry Weichbrodt
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Access Systems
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Al Gilman
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone - Usability Nissen, Dan E
• special announcement:Fw: Accessibility Forum June 2002 Webcast David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Liz Fuller
• Page validation (was RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone) John Foliot - bytown internet
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone John Foliot - bytown internet
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Jerry Weichbrodt
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone Jerry Weichbrodt
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: speak plugins? Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: FW: JSTOR and accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: JSTOR and accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Woolley
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: FW: JSTOR and accessibility Access Systems
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl

Tuesday, 28 May 2002

• Re: FW: JSTOR and accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: JSTOR and accessibility David Poehlman
• RE: JSTOR and accessibility John Foliot - bytown internet
• FW: JSTOR and accessibility Audrey J. Gorman
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Poehlman
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Woolley
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone David Poehlman
• Testing web page accessibility by phone phoenixl
• speak plugins? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Jerry Weichbrodt
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Aaron Smith
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Jerry Weichbrodt

Monday, 27 May 2002

• AccVerify SE for FrontPage - Request for Beta Participation Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Jukka Korpela

Sunday, 26 May 2002

• Hi-Caption 1.75 Software Beta Testers Needed Robert B. Yonaitis

Saturday, 25 May 2002

• RE: issues surrounding the use of images to submit forms Jim Thatcher

Friday, 24 May 2002

• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Poehlman
• Re: images used as form submit buttons David Woolley
• Re: images used as form submit buttons David Woolley
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Woolley
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites John Foliot - bytown internet
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Patrick Burke
• Re: Fw: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related Access Systems
• Fw: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related David Poehlman
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Aaron Smith
• Re: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related John Foliot - bytown internet
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites John Foliot - bytown internet
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Phill Jenkins
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Aaron Smith
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Jerry Weichbrodt
• RE: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related Nissen, Dan E
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Jerry Weichbrodt
• Federal Credit Union Question ADA related Suzanne Nikolaisen
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites John Foliot - bytown internet
• Re: Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI Access Systems
• Re: Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI Access Systems
• Re: images used as form submit buttons Tom Gilder
• Re: images used as form submit buttons Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: complete trouble reports (how much configuration info?) Access Systems
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Jon Hanna
• Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI Ineke van der Maat
• Re: images used as form submit buttons Ineke van der Maat
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Jon Hanna
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Joel Sanda
• Re: images used as form submit buttons Al Gilman
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Aaron Smith
• RE: images used as form submit buttons Scarlett Julian (ED)
• complete trouble reports (how much configuration info?) Al Gilman
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Poehlman
• Re: images used as form submit buttons Aaron Smith
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Poehlman
• RE: images used as form submit buttons RUST Randal
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Jerry Weichbrodt
• images used as form submit buttons Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Access Systems
• Re: Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Aaron Smith
• Re: Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" Demonpenta2@aol.com
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Access Systems
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Wendy Fraser
• issues surrounding the use of images to submit forms Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements David Poehlman
• RE: Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" Jon Hanna
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Access Systems

Thursday, 23 May 2002

• Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements Tom Gilder
• Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? David Poehlman
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Nick Kew
• Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? Nick Kew
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements David Poehlman
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements David Poehlman
• RE: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? RUST Randal
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements David Poehlman
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements David Poehlman
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Alan Chuter
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Jukka Korpela
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Jon Hanna
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements Jukka Korpela
• place-holding characters in form elements Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: www.groningen-museum.nl Alan Chuter
• Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? David Woolley

Wednesday, 22 May 2002

• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Phill Jenkins
• thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? David Poehlman
• www.groningen-museum.nl jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Online caption typography Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites Wendy Fraser
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites David Poehlman
• RE: abbreviation title within a link: howto? Al Gilman
• RE: media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? RUST Randal
• RE: media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? RUST Randal
• RE: abbreviation title within a link: howto? Jukka Korpela
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? David Woolley
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? Jason Ramsay-Brown

Tuesday, 21 May 2002

• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? Joe Clark
• Re: media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? Tom Gilder
• media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? David Poehlman
• Re: Accessible Navigation Menus jonathan chetwynd
• Online caption typography Joe Clark

Wednesday, 1 May 2002

• abbreviation title within a link: howto? jonathan chetwynd

Tuesday, 21 May 2002

• RE: Accessible Navigation Menus Dan Billingsley
• Re: Accessible Navigation Menus Jim Ley
• RE: Accessible Navigation Menus Jim Allan
• Accessible Navigation Menus Lubow Scott
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Poehlman
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Mike Scott
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Poehlman

Monday, 20 May 2002

• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Jim Thatcher
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Mike Scott
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Jim Allan
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Woolley
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Phill Jenkins
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Rebecca Cox
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Poehlman
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Phill Jenkins
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Nick Kew
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Jon Hanna
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Poehlman
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Tom Gilder
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Simon White
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Poehlman
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' Simon White
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' David Poehlman
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' Charles McCathieNevile
• visibility of 'skip links' Scarlett Julian (ED)

Sunday, 19 May 2002

• Slightly Off-Topic: CSS book complete Kynn Bartlett
• [media] Goodies Thoughts - W3C Wants You Kathleen Anderson

Friday, 17 May 2002

• Re: another forms question Michelle Podd

Thursday, 16 May 2002

• Re: another forms question Joe Clark
• Sorry For Extra Post Robert B. Yonaitis
• May be of Interest to this group Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? Danny Ayers
• RE: another forms question Jim Thatcher
• Re: crawling validator David Woolley
• Re: crawling validator Nick Kew
• Re: crawling validator David Woolley
• Re: crawling validator Thanasis Kinias
• Re: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? Jim Byrne
• RE: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? Jukka Korpela

Wednesday, 15 May 2002

• RE: inline styles vs. linked css Access Systems
• RE: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? Danny Ayers
• another forms question Michelle Podd

Tuesday, 14 May 2002

• google history problem: philosophical, well maybe jonathan chetwynd
• crawling validator jonathan chetwynd
• CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? Jim Byrne
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css Andrew McFarland
• Re: Accessibility issues in CSS3 Colour David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility issues in CSS3 Colour David Woolley
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css Access Systems

Monday, 13 May 2002

• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited David Woolley
• Accessibility issues in CSS3 Colour Joe Clark
• Re: Java and accessibility Access Systems
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css Andrew McFarland
• RE: Help sections - best practice Simon White
• Re: Help sections - best practice jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Help sections - best practice jonathan chetwynd
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css Jukka Korpela
• Re: Java and accessibility David Poehlman
• inline styles vs. linked css Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Java and accessibility EDixon@rnib.org.uk

Sunday, 12 May 2002

• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited Vadim Plessky
• Re: free/not free proprietary Vadim Plessky

Saturday, 11 May 2002

• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited Phill Jenkins

Friday, 10 May 2002

• Fw: MVU OID Standards - Accessibility Standards Added (fwd) David Poehlman
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited - useful article Pat Byrne

Thursday, 9 May 2002

• RE: Linearising layout tables Mike Scott
• Help sections - best practice Simon White

Wednesday, 8 May 2002

• Re: Linearising layout tables David Woolley
• RE: Linearising layout tables Jon Hanna
• Linearising layout tables Nick Kew
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited David Poehlman
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited David Woolley

Tuesday, 7 May 2002

• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited Michelle Podd
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited Michelle Podd
• Announcement-HiSoftware's Accessibility Interview Wizard provides the bridge between automated and visual testing Dana Louise Simberkoff
• RE: compliance and layout tables revisited Denise Wood
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited Joe Clark
• Announcement-HiSoftware's Accessibility Interview Wizard provides the bridge between automated and visual testing Dana Louise Simberkoff
• compliance and layout tables revisited Michelle Podd
• Re: Maps and accessibility David Woolley
• RE: Query re authoring tool compliance Denise Wood
• Re: Maps and accessibility Kristina Seyer Smith

Monday, 6 May 2002

• Re: Maps and accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Query re authoring tool compliance Rebecca Cox
• Maps and accessibility Rebecca Cox
• RE: JAWS access to Web forms Patrick Burke

Sunday, 5 May 2002

• RE: JAWS access to Web forms Kelly Ford
• Re: Help with Accessibility survey Charles McCathieNevile
• JAWS access to Web forms David R. Stong

Saturday, 4 May 2002

• Emacspeak-16.0 (CleverDog) Unleashed! T. V. Raman

Friday, 3 May 2002

• Re: free/not free proprietary David Woolley
• Re: free/not free proprietary David Woolley
• Re: free/not free proprietary Martin McCormick
• Help with Accessibility survey Simon White
• Re: MAGpie 2.01 public beta David Poehlman
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community Simon White
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community Simon White
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: free/not free proprietary jonathan chetwynd
• MAGpie 2.01 public beta Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 2 May 2002

• Re: free/not free proprietary Nick Kew
• RE: free/not free proprietary Access Systems
• RE: free/not free proprietary Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: free/not free proprietary David Poehlman
• RE: free/not free proprietary Jim Thatcher
• Re: free/not free proprietary Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: free/not free proprietary Jim Ley
• Comments? Requirements for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Judy Brewer
• Re: free/not free proprietary Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: free/not free proprietary Nick Kew
• Re: free/not free proprietary Martin McCormick
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community Jon Hanna
• E-voting: good for disabled community Simon White
• Re: free/not free proprietary Access Systems
• free/not free proprietary Phill Jenkins
• keyboard shortcut for: minimise maximise and close jonathan chetwynd
• Re: text in images David Poehlman
• Re: text in images Access Systems
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Nick Kew
• Re: text in images Charles McCathieNevile
• text in images Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au

Wednesday, 1 May 2002

• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Martin Sloan
• Re: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled Tom Gilder
• RE: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled Simon White
• Re: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled Tom Gilder
• RE: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled Simon White
• Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled David Sloan
• RE: Query re authoring tool compliance Denise Wood

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• Re: media: government computer news: "beyond Section 508: David Poehlman
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Martin McCormick
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Query re authoring tool compliance Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Phill Jenkins
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Phill Jenkins
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Phill Jenkins
• Web Services Architecture Requirements open for comment Al Gilman
• Query re authoring tool compliance Denise Wood
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please David Woolley
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems

Monday, 29 April 2002

• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Nick Kew
• Re: media: government computer news: "beyond Section 508: Demonpenta2@aol.com
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Phill Jenkins
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Martin McCormick
• Re: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 Joe Clark
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• Virus alert: [was: Hi,your password] Erik Hodge
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Phill Jenkins
• Re: Something else interesting from the BBC (Betsie) Patrick Burke
• Re: Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? Martin McCormick
• RE: site maps Denise Wood
• RE: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 Denise Wood
• site maps Simon White
• RE: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 Phill Jenkins
• Re: Something else interesting from the BBC Martin McCormick
• media: government computer news: "beyond Section 508: David Poehlman
• Re: Do not open attachment in: "Hi,your password" Access Systems
• Re: Do not open attachment in: "Hi,your password" David Woolley
• Do not open attachment in: "Hi,your password" Judy Brewer
• RE: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 Denise Wood
• RE: Frontpage to Flash move Denise Wood
• CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 Joe Clark
• Hi,your password Webmaster

Sunday, 28 April 2002

• question robert neff
• RE: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Denise Wood
• Frontpage to Flash move Gregor Wolbring
• RE: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Denise Wood
• RE: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Denise Wood

Saturday, 27 April 2002

• Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Joe Clark
• Fw: Simplified Text: Examples and Resources David Poehlman
• Re: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Jim Thatcher
• Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Denise Wood
• Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Al Gilman
• Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? Denise Wood

Friday, 26 April 2002

• Re: FW: CSS positioning aint good enough? David Woolley
• Fw: Link to us at DisabilityDirect.gov David Poehlman
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Phill Jenkins
• Flash access articles posted Joe Clark
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pagesaccessible. Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: CSS Positioning Solution was: CSS positioning aint good enoug h? RUST Randal
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pagesaccessible. Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pagesaccessible. Christian Seus
• Re: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. David Poehlman
• Re: FW: CSS positioning aint good enough? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. Charles McCathieNevile
• FW: CSS positioning aint good enough? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. Christian Seus

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Re: Windows XP Caution Vadim Plessky

Friday, 26 April 2002

• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? RUST Randal
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. Simon White
• good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. David Poehlman
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Peter Verhoeven
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Peter Verhoeven
• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties john_slatin
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Nick Kew
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Mike Scott
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Nick Kew

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Nick Kew
• Re: Fwd: Macromedia Accessibility webcast...Please distribute David Woolley
• Re: CSS positioning aint good enough? David Woolley
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please David Woolley
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please David Woolley
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please David Woolley
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jean-Marie D'Amour
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• Re: CSS positioning aint good enough? Nick Kew
• Fw: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Ineke van der Maat
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Ineke van der Maat
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? RUST Randal
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties jonathan chetwynd
• Fwd: Macromedia Accessibility webcast...Please distribute robert neff
• FW: Real-time captions in streaming media Denise Wood
• Re: Real-time captions in streaming media Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties Marja-Riitta Koivunen
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Steven McCaffrey
• RE: popup Javascript alert - accessible? Jon Hanna
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? Jim Ley
• RE: Font streaming - good or bad? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link Al Gilman
• RE: Font streaming - good or bad? Simon White
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? Access Systems
• RE: Real-time captions in streaming media Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Access Systems
• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties john_slatin
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link David Poehlman
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Font streaming - good or bad? Charles McCathieNevile
• CSS positioning aint good enough? SHARPE, Ian
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link David Poehlman
• RE: longdesc for an image used as a link Jukka Korpela
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Peter Verhoeven
• longdesc for an image used as a link goliver@accease.com
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Tina Marie Holmboe
• RE: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Harry Woodrow
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Tina Marie Holmboe
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? David Woolley
• RE: Real-time captions in streaming media Denise Wood

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? Access Systems
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please David Woolley
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities David Woolley
• Re: Font streaming - good or bad? David Woolley
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope David Woolley
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please David Woolley
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope David Woolley
• Real-time captions in streaming media Joe Clark
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Phill Jenkins
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Phill Jenkins
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope Phill Jenkins
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jim Allan
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jean-Marie D'Amour
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jim Allan
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Phill Jenkins
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jim Allan
• You can download the Vsign Builder and Player free (fwd) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? David Poehlman
• Big oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities jonathan chetwynd
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Patrick Burke
• oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Peter Verhoeven
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Jim Byrne
• RE: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Bob Regan
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please Patrick Burke
• RE: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Snyder, Ethan [JJCUS]
• Re: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible David Poehlman
• Re: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible David Poehlman
• Frames and accessibility: opinions please Jim Byrne
• oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities jonathan chetwynd
• Designing websites for people with learning disabilities jonathan chetwynd
• WCAG Priorities does not help the low vision Peter Verhoeven
• Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Joe Clark
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Access Systems

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• Re: Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) Nick Kew
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jim Allan
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible David Poehlman
• RE: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Snyder, Ethan [JJCUS]
• Flash News Flash: It's Accessible Suzanne Nikolaisen
• Font streaming - good or bad? Simon White
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Mike Scott
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope Andy J. W. Affleck
• popup Javascript alert - accessible? Jim Byrne
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Charles McCathieNevile
• media:Fw: Web Content Gains New Flash David Poehlman
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Charles McCathieNevile
• media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible David Poehlman
• Re: Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) Nick Kew

Monday, 22 April 2002

• Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) Nick Kew
• XHTML, CSS, 508 Standards Andy J. W. Affleck
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope Andy J. W. Affleck
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Phill Jenkins
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Jim Thatcher
• [off topic] new virus wrinkle Al Gilman
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope Mike Scott
• A new one: label vs. Scope Andy J. W. Affleck
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please Jérôme Ernu
• Re: Label versus Title Andy J. W. Affleck
• Audible books - good idea done badly... Simon White
• RE: legal responsibility Scarlett Julian (ED)

Sunday, 21 April 2002

• RE: Seeking guidance...a thread renewed? Nick Kew
• Re: Label versus Title David Woolley
• RE: Seeking guidance...a thread renewed? jonathan chetwynd
• Re: Label versus Title David Woolley
• RE: Label versus Title Al Gilman

Saturday, 20 April 2002

• RE: Label versus Title Al Gilman
• Re: Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Label versus Title Jim Thatcher
• Re: Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors Patrick Burke
• Re: Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors David Woolley

Friday, 19 April 2002

• Re: Label versus Title David Woolley
• Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors Patrick Burke
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs Nick Kew
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs Nick Kew
• Label versus Title Andy J. W. Affleck
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Personalisation - your thoughts please David Poehlman
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please Jon Hanna
• self-selection, transparency, and priorities was Re: Personalisation - your thoughts please jonathan chetwynd
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please Simon White
• Re: Personalisation - your thoughts please Kjetil Kjernsmo
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs SHARPE, Ian
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please Michael R. Burks
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please Jon Hanna
• Personalisation - your thoughts please Simon White

Thursday, 18 April 2002

• Re: newsletter formats for email David Woolley
• Re: Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case Nick Kew
• Re: Credit Union Website Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case David Poehlman
• Re: Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case Nick Kew
• Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case Joe Clark
• Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs Nick Kew
• RE: Disability Stats Mark Magennis
• Credit Union Website Accessibility Suzanne Nikolaisen
• Disability Stats Asif
• Re: RE: legal responsibility Martin Sloan
• Re: newsletter formats for email Tina Marie Holmboe

Wednesday, 17 April 2002

• RE: newsletter formats for email Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: newsletter formats for email Michelle Podd
• RE: newsletter formats for email Denise Wood
• RE: legal responsibility Denise Wood
• RE: newsletter formats for email Jon Hanna
• Re: newsletter formats for email Tina Marie Holmboe
• media:Fw: Web Privacy Standard: It's a Start David Poehlman
• newsletter formats for email Michelle Podd
• Re: a site to love: Michelle Podd
• a site to love: David Poehlman
• Re: Please review: R2 proposal to supplement the current R1 proposal goliver@accease.com

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Re: legal responsibility Martin Sloan
• RE: Accessible mobile phones (slightly ot) Simon White
• RE: legal responsibility Simon White
• Re: legal responsibility Access Systems
• legal responsibility Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Accessible Mobile Phones (slightly ot) goliver@accease.com
• RE: Patent on XML and XSLT together? Jon Hanna
• RE: Patent on XML and XSLT together? Jon Hanna
• RE: Patent on XML and XSLT together? SHARPE, Ian
• FW: Patent on XML and XSLT together? SHARPE, Ian

Monday, 15 April 2002

• RE: long tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: long tables Harvey Bingham
• RE: long tables Jim Thatcher
• long tables Scarlett Julian (ED)

Sunday, 14 April 2002

• Re: word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] Access Systems
• Re: word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] David Woolley
• Re: word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] Jim Ley
• word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] Al Gilman
• once more with word wrap - what to do with Web Services Al Gilman
• Re: Request for input - what to do with Web Services Access Systems
• Request for input - what to do with Web Services Al Gilman
• Fw: About an article I'm writing - making webpages accessible David Poehlman

Saturday, 13 April 2002

• Re: note: Resource: Simplified Web Accessibility Guide Kathleen Anderson
• note: Resource: Simplified Web Accessibility Guide David Poehlman

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Fw: [cmac-access] Resource: Simplified Web Accessibility Guide David Poehlman
• Re: Learning About Web Accessibility kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Re: Learning About Web Accessibility kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com
• Describing TABLE structure Royce Shin
• RE: Constructing Accessible Web Sites Jim Tobias
• Learning About Web Accessibility Denise Wood
• Kynn's course: was Learning about Web Accessibility Simon White
• RE: Learning About Web Accessibility Scarlett Julian (ED)
• £48 is not very accessible! Re: Learning About Web Accessibility Jonathan Chetwynd

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• RE: Learning About Web Accessibility Jim Thatcher
• Re: Learning About Web Accessibility Patrick Burke
• Learning About Web Accessibility Suzanne Nikolaisen
• Question about the use of "title" tag and screen readers Jérôme Ernu

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CSS sizing Charles McCathieNevile
• Are Forms Tabular Data? RUST Randal

Tuesday, 9 April 2002

• Re: defining table data for layout purposes David Woolley
• Fw: correction to my earlier post on the guide: David Poehlman
• Fw: A Guide to Making Documents Accessible to People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired David Poehlman
• PARC Releases Popout Prism Software (Enhanced Thumbnail Browser) phoenixl
• defining table data for layout purposes David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk
• Arachnophilia 5.1 Web authoring tool EDixon@rnib.org.uk
• Slashdot article Re: unasked for downloads? jonathan chetwynd

Monday, 8 April 2002

• Re: Software support for Aural styles David Poehlman
• Re: Software support for Aural styles Andrew McFarland

Sunday, 7 April 2002

• Fw: corporate e-learning accessibility - your experiences requested David Poehlman

Friday, 5 April 2002

• Re: Software support for Aural styles Joe Clark
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Joe Clark
• Software support for Aural styles PERRY, Grant

Thursday, 4 April 2002

• RE: linking to transcripts of audio files George Kerscher
• Blackboard Accessibility Reidy Brown
• Re: Accessibility of PDF files & editing them David Poehlman
• RE: Accessibility of PDF files & editing them Israel Pinto
• linking to transcripts of audio files Jo Miller
• RE: CSS sizing Jukka Korpela

Wednesday, 3 April 2002

• CSS sizing SHARPE, Ian
• Gateway donating computers to 501(c)'s. Demonpenta2@aol.com

Tuesday, 2 April 2002

• RE: relative font sizing Mike Scott
• Re: relative font sizing David Woolley
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Jason Megginson
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Steven McCaffrey
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Jason Megginson
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: Post-F2F: Meeting Jack La Lanne Masafumi NAKANE
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Steven McCaffrey
• relative font sizing Michelle Podd
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Jason Megginson
• Accesibility of PDF files & editing them Viral.Patel@exim.gov
• RE: Published work on Accessibility available Barry McMullin
• Bobby Accessibility Error David Bacon
• RE: Published work on Accessibility available Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Re: Published work on Accessibility available Barry McMullin

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 23:20:32 UTC