- From: Steven McCaffrey <SMCCAFFR@MAIL.NYSED.GOV>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:15:45 -0400
- To: <tyler_kendall@ncsu.edu>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello Tyler: Welcome to the list. I use JFW and agree with the Section 508 guide for spacer images. The idea is to not hear anything if the image is just a spacer. I'm not sure about lists, I'd have to see the context. You could use alt="bullet" perhaps. I think alt is a required attribute of the IMG tag so it is not strictly speaking just for Bobby compliance. Steve ITS NYSED >>> Tyler Kendall <tyler_kendall@ncsu.edu> 06/28/01 10:36AM >>> Hello all, First, as I'm new to the list, a brief introduction: My name is Tyler Kendall and I'm in charge of providing accessible web design education, consulting, and review at NC State University. "Hello!" I'm hoping to get a consensus of what people feel is the 'best practice' regarding the use of ALT tags for spacer images. I have been recommending using ALT=' ' and giving the file a meaningful name (like 'spacer.gif'). The new access board guide to Section 508 (http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm) is the first place I've seen this officially recommended - though I recall seeing it used once or twice in examples in other guides. While this approach seems the best I've come across, I'm not entirely pleased with it. JAWS, the screen reader with which I have the most experience, treats these images the same as images with no ALT tag what-so-ever, and in many ways this seems to be a trick to get Bobby approval. Is there a better way to provide users of screen readers a solution here? On a similar note, I've been recommending the use of ALT='bullet' for graphic list bullets (when people seem unwilling to use the HTML list markup), but I'm wondering, does ALT='*' has much support? Thanks, tyler. -- Tyler Kendall Web Accessibility Specialist North Carolina State University Voice: 919-513-4087 Fax: 919-513-1893 Email: tyler_kendall@ncsu.edu
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 11:19:10 UTC