- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:30:53 -0700
- To: Jennifer Sutton <jensutton@earthlink.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 10:52 AM -0400 2001/6/14, Jennifer Sutton wrote: >I've seen folks who don't typically use screen readers get far too >wrapped up in how the screen reader *sounds*, and that's not what's >at issue for a site developer. It takes a while to get used to the >sound of a screen reader, and I wonder if that time might be better >spent watching someone else use one, and/or paying someone to give >concrete feedback on pages. Very well said. In general, I think that my own "screenreader testing" of a web site, as a sighted user and very irregular user of a screenreader, is pretty much next to worthless. As someone who has never had to -rely- on a screenreader (yet?), I can so easily become confused and think that problems with my understanding of the tool are problems with the site itself, or vice-versa, thinking that something is not a problem because it "seems okay" to me. (Especially as I've probably already seen the visual version of the site and built my idea of the information infrastructure from -that-.) There is little value in a "light dependent" (sighted) user sitting down with a screenreader and testing a web site to see "if blind people can access it." An addition to that statment: There is value in web designers trying out screenreaders to get a -sense- of what the user experience is like, but detailed and rigorous testing of a site with conclusions and changes based upon a sighted user's access via screenreader (or any other assistive technology) is generally not worthwhile. Instead, I very, very strongly recommend that you do the following: * Follow the abstractions of accessibility listed in WCAG and other guidelines; these are one step back, conceptually, from the real question of "is this accessible?" but someone else has already done most of the legwork for you in figuring out what you need. and, * Drop the abstraction at least once so you don't lose sight of the REAL question, which is, "Can people with disabilities access this site?" And the ONLY way you can tell that is to do user testing, despite what guidelines or tools or regulations tell you on the abstract level. In other words, I heartily recommend that you Go Out And Hire A Blind Guy To Test Your Web Site, if you care whether or not blind guys can access your web page. Recruit Some Students From The Local School For The Developmentally Disabled and ask them to test your site, if you care if their special needs are being met. There is no better way to validate accessibility. All the DTDs, Bobbies, WCAGs, AWARE Centers, essays, books, and authoring tools in the world can't give you a clear answer than simple and adequate user testing. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2001 13:36:46 UTC