- From: Charles F. Munat <chas@munat.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:25:40 -0700
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
One thing that no-one seems to have mentioned in this thread is the problem with email address scraping. On my sites I usually provide a form for all the reasons already mentioned. It guides the user and let's him/her know what information we need to adequately process his/her request. It doesn't require familiarity with an email program. And it can be used from any browser. But I also provide an email address in a mailto: link at the bottom of every page on the site (two, usually: one for the company and one for the webmaster). And I provide an email address in plain text on the form page at the least and usually at the bottom of every page. Then I sit back and wait for the spam. I agree that it is important to give users as much flexibility as possible when replying to a site. (With most sites, I'm happy if they provide *any* method for giving feedback -- lots don't.) But the more complex the system gets, the more it costs to maintain it, as Al mentioned. What Al didn't say is that increasing the cost of one function means taking money from others. There will be trade-offs involved. What user feature should we leave off to pay for the extra cost of our customer service features? I don't think it's cut and dried -- it really needs to be looked at on a case basis. But we should acknowledge that some sites deliberately hide email addresses by using forms, and they do so because they want to minimize spam. Any solutions to the spam problem? How can I include an email address that the user can read, but an address-scraping agent cannot? Any suggestions for how to provide the flexibility of both mailto and forms without significantly increasing the costs (and thus giving up other features)? (Note: IMO the priorities on most sites are all screwed up already, so freeing up money for better customer service handling might be just a matter of getting the priorities straight. For the above question, however, I am assuming that we've distributed our funds in a reasonably wise manner already and that spending more on customer service will result in giving up a *useful* function. How can we get the best of both mailto and forms *without* increasing the cost? Any ideas?) Charles F. Munat Seattle, Washington
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 12:24:17 UTC