- From: Tim Harshbarger <tim.harshbarger.cqwg@statefarm.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 06:50:26 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <DDAEA8186984D41188CE00D0B79DE2EB043ACD41@NSBRB3F.statefarm.com>
The best way to find an answer to this question would be to perform an usability test. Everything else is just a guess. From what little I can recollect from working with various user interface guidelines for different platforms, it seems that a hot key simulates a mouse click unless the control or collection receiving focus provides multiple options to choose. Then the hot key seems only to bring focus to that control. This would seem to indicate to me that a hot key associated with a link should trigger the link. -- if we are just basing a decision on how other user interface guides suggest things ought to work. I also think there may be less difference in how someone with a mobility impairment and visual impairment would want a hot key to work. It is true that someone with a mobility impairment only will be able to see the screen and most likely want the control/item immediately activated when she or he uses the appropriate hot key. From my observations, I think that people with visual impairments tend to work in the same way, whether or not they can see a visual display of the page. I notice that people with visual impairments (myself included) do not know what the hot keys for an interface are until the interface is reviewed via screen reader, braille display, screen magnification, or some other technology. It seems that people with visual impairments try to build a mental model of an interface first. Use of hot keys seems not to occur until the person becomes comfortable with the interface. So, it might be erroneous to assume that someone with a visual impairment would want focus to move to the item instead of the item being activated. In this thread, we seem to be discussing two problems. How should ACCESSKEY manipulate items? Also, how can we allow users with disabilities to get to links more efficiently? My thought is that we need to be careful about linking these two problems too closely together. The optimal solution for one is probably not the optimal solution for the other problem. Of course, some usability testing would be a great way for us to solve these problems. Hmmmm, can you tell I spend a lot of time working with Human-Computer interaction people? Tim Tim Harshbarger Disability Support State Farm Insurance Companies Email: Tim.Harshbarger.CQWG@StateFarm.com Phone 309-766-0154
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 07:50:43 UTC