- From: Joel Sanda <joels@ecollege.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:08:02 -0600
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I know this has been hashed out in the past, and if I remember right the list agreed, for the most part, that an accessible document successfully regresses to the HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.0 specifications. But, I'm unclear on the list's recommendations for adhering first to the WCAG and then to the specifications for HTML and CSS. A site can meet WCAG recommendations and not meet the HTML and CSS recommendations, but that is obviously not advisable or even acceptable, in my opionion. Given the rendering differences between Windows versions of Opera, Netscape 4.x, Netscape 6.x, and Internet Explorer 5.x, (not to mention the MacOS), how much of an issue is it meeting the WCAG 1.0 recommendations and not meeting the HTML/XHTML and CSS specifications? Thanks! Joel Joel Sanda Quality Assurance Manager -------------------------------------------------------www.eCollege.com eCollege joels@ecollege.com p. 303.873.7400 x 3021 m 303.883.4468 f. 303.873.7449 > "Educators Working for Educators" >
Received on Monday, 9 April 2001 13:08:18 UTC