- From: Ben Morris <bmorris@activematter.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:54:38 -0400
- To: "Dave J Woolley" <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
With proper use of a template (such as at my employer) you can have it generate .htm pages using ColdFusion (or whatever) for static content. This eases server workload as well as client download strain. -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dave J Woolley Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:39 PM To: 'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org' Subject: RE: Commercial Realities and Accessibility (was: Are Small Text buttons level 2 compliant) > From: Ben Morris [SMTP:bmorris@activematter.com] > > > The other factor is that most large scale sites are template driven, > especially those made by my company. The beauty there is that you can > make > several versions of the site by changing just one template page. So with > [DJW:] A problem with server side templates are that they often do not keep up to date with minority browsers. A common complaint on the lynx mailing list (I believe quite a few blind user use Lynx and, at least at one time, it was used to provide public access to the web from US libraries for those without their own machines) is that they are not given access to features of the page that they could use because the site suppresses those features because it incorrectly believes the browser cannot cope (some also complain that they don't want to lose the feature even though they have to do some source reading to work with the page). (The typical commercial approach, of course, is to output an upgrade your browser message, and give up.) [DJW:] Another problem with them, for static pages, is that they are cache unfriendly. This is a particular problem for poorer countries. Many ISPs in such countries feel forced to configure caches to cache very aggressively because too few static pages are cacheable these days. This causes security problems as they can cache dynamic content like web email, but they still prefer that to refetching what is really a static page, just because it was ASP generated. In fact, there is something of a war going on with sites trying to ensure that their banner advertising pages don't get cached and ISPs caching more and more aggressively to ensure that they do. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2000 14:54:25 UTC