- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 06:04:38 -0700
- To: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>, "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 11:15 AM +0100 9/7/00, Dave J Woolley wrote: > > From: Kynn Bartlett [SMTP:kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com] > > DHTML is _not_ the threat; the threat is webmasters who don't >> understand how to use them properly. > [DJW:] > In the context of books and conferences, I'd > say the real threat was authors and speakers > who pander to the "wants" of such people. I > don't know the speakers in this conference, but > most books and many authoring web site fall in > that category. Calling it "pandering" and dismissing the "wants" -- which are often based on pretty sound, if not inclusive, principles of marketing and design -- is a good way to get these people to not listen to us. :) > > If we make sweeping statements that "DHTML is bad" or "Flash > [DJW:] > I find it interesting to note that such a statement >is usually made about PDF (actually, on the >sort of site that is likely to use flash etc., it is the >PDF that is likely to contain real information, not the >HTML - I tend to treat the HTML as a hazard to navigation >in finding the PDF). I don't like it when people claim, in a vacuum, that PDF is inaccessible either. The presence of PDF does _not_ make a site inaccessible; it's the _absence_ of non-PDF access to the content which does so! -- -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 09:22:19 UTC