- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:13:43 +0100
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> From: Kynn Bartlett [SMTP:kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com] > > Let's not be too quick to condemn useful technology with the > label of "maximizing the inaccessibility" -- nothing about the > use of DHTML, Flash, etc. guarantees inaccessibility any more > or less than the use of HTML itself does! [DJW:] However, the audience for this sort of thing, when it appears in books, is generally people who want cook book solutions to improving their ability to impress people with spending power, rather than their ability to convey information to everyone that might want that information. Generally such people either have no concept of an accessibility issue, or believe that adding accessibility will cost them money, and probably compromise the effect of the site, without gaining them money If the conference really is there to put across an accessibility angle, I think the re-post to the WAI list should have specifically pointed that out. The specific problem with HTML tricks is that they treat particular browsers as thin clients, rather than working within the defined semantics of the language. You can use them to provide better fallbacks, but I think this is rare. Things like flash tend to be used either as pure ornamentation, or to control a selling process such that the prospect only gets the intended message. They could be used to really explain things, but that can often be done by using them in simple and obvious ways. Although I must admit I generally reject Flash, I don't think I've ever come across a site where it looked as though it would help me, and I generally find it correlates with sites which are difficult to navigate and contain little information. [DJW:] -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2000 15:13:46 UTC