- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 23:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>, "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I (and a few other people) have worked on different things required for making conformance claims in RDF. If these are made on the web, and are searchable (there is quite a lot of work being done to make sure this happens for RDF) then it should become relatively simple to publish a discoverable counter-claim. The question of whose claim to trust then is of course an issue, but more a social one than a technical one, in my opinion. cheers Charles McCN On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, William Loughborough wrote: DW:: "Is there any option, when contacting the webmaster fails, for dealing with a site that claims AAA rating but fails priority 2 checkpoint?" WL: Probably nothing very satisfactory. HOWEVER, there is hope with the advent of RDF because we might very well then have a "web of trust" and even though a site posts a AAA icon anyone interested (and knowing of) the D. Woolley "truth about accessibility" site can find a believable list of miscreants abusing the conformance claims' identifier. Although it is unlikely that W3C/WAI will risk public finger pointing, there is nothing (except possible libel/slander sorts of things) to preclude any trusted "authority" from indexing metadata about sites - especially those who stick their heads high enough to be easily located. CAST may not want to monitor everybody using their imprimateur, but others of us might well. -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2000 23:06:04 UTC