- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:14:43 -0400 (EDT)
- To: webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net
- cc: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Well, it depends what the browser is - some are seriously broken to the point of not being able to render accessible content. But in general I would say that if the content is unreadable it is not accessible... Charles On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Bruce Bailey wrote: Allow me to restate the question from a side conversation Dave and I have having: Can a page/site which is WCAG AAA compliant consider itself "accessible" even though the default rendering with a popular browser turns the intended content into useless hash? Dave J Woolley wrote: > > From: Bruce Bailey [SMTP:bbailey@clark.net] > > > > > > look at the source of http://www.dors.state.md.us/mrc/programs.html and > > http://www.dors.state.md.us/mrc/kiosk.css and tell me how I might get text > [DJW:] > This breaks quite badly on NS4.5. Off list correspondence > suggests that this was intended as a "best viewed on > WebKiosk v.v" page, rather than a "best viewed on Any > Browser" <http://www.anybrowser.org/> one. > > The question was raised as to whether there was any duty > on accessible content authors to author for anything other > than fully compliant browsers. (I believe that the lack of > these means it is.) -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Monday, 24 July 2000 22:14:46 UTC