- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:15:54 -0700
- To: JAN HECHT <HECHT@SCSU.CTSTATEU.EDU>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 2:29 PM -0700 7/19/00, JAN HECHT wrote: >Oh, I'm all for individual expression. I'll grant you that as long as it's >clear what is and what isn't a hyperlink, constency or a "style sheet" may >not be necessary. But at the same time, it seems a site should be pretty >intuitive to use -- or visitors aren't going to stick around long enough to >figure out how to navigate it. And why risk the chance that folks might >miss important information? Isn't the point of informaiton design to ensure >people are receiving the information? Yes and no. Each site may or may not have their own goals, and in a real world setting, things such as "does the vice president like the way it looks" may take priority. :) Which is why we need to support anything that strengthens a web publishing framework that gives control back to the end user -- such as support for CSS, which allows you to say "underline these" if you want them underlined, "invert these" if you want them inverted, and so on. -- -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2000 17:21:38 UTC