- From: Veglahn, Wendee (WT Chen) <Veglahn@Volpe.DOT.Gov>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:13:01 -0400
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
One reason why I would not use the phrase "click here" or similar is that it insinuates the user is able to use a pointing device (mouse or what have you) which is not always true. Whether or not this is being a bit too sensitive on how the phrase maybe taken by the user, may just be a personal issue/preference. > -----Original Message----- > From: tom mcCain [SMTP:tmccain@on-net.net] > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 12:46 PM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: NOW: appropriate hypertext > > > The real problem with "click" is it represents a failure > > to think about appropriate hypertext... > > I think it is possible to use appropriate hypertext and still use the word > "click" in that hypertext. > > Link copy should tell users what to expect when they follow a link. Making > rules for how we accomplish that misses the point. > > Whether we use "click," "select," "follow," "read," "choose," "slam" or > "pound" as the active verb is a literary issue, not a literal one, as long > as meaning is clear. > > Terminology is an appropriate part of design. Depending on the context and > purpose of one site, I may choose to use one hypertext phrase throughout. > On a different site, I may choose variety. That choice and the goal of > clarity rightly belong within the creative challenge. > > ../tom > > > > tom 'n' mindy mcCain > > designers of really neat web stuff > since before the turn of the last century > > tom@crittur.com | mindy@crittur.com | 13-h@indianaoutboard.org > > http://www.crittur.com | indianapolis, indiana usa >
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2000 13:13:04 UTC