- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:40:12 +0100
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I'm going to comment on this document in several parts.... The case for image scaling being a benefit is flawed. A larger image in itself will improve readability, but not because of greater detail, but rather because it allows someone with poor eyesight to see the same level of detail as someone with good vision would see on a smaller image. In fact, if I look at figure 1.1 without my glasses, the pixellated image is easier to see than the detailed image, because the pixellation results in heavy black outlines. Image scaling can improve readability of technical diagrams for all users. In principle, vector formats can reduce the volume of transmitted data and therefore improve accessibility to people who can't afford high bandwidth connections, however, there have been requests for data compression on the SVG list, suggesting that real life SVG is fairly bloated.
Received on Monday, 17 July 2000 08:48:28 UTC