- From: Christopher R. Maden <crism@yomu.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 15:42:24 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 08:41 2-07-2000 -0400, you wrote: >The example there, as a fragment of XHTML stripped of accesskeys and other >features, is something like > ><fieldset> > <legend>Choice of role</legend> > <input type="radio" name="choices" value="1" />Option 1 > <input type="radio" name="choices" value="2" />Option 2 ></fieldset> > >An HTML browser that doesn't recognise this will present the text "Choice of >role" as a paragraph on its own before the radio buttons, so most assistive >technologies should render it as text even if they don't associate it in any >more meaningful way. That's not quite accurate. A browser that doesn't recognize this will ignore any unknown markup: Choice of role <input type="radio" name="choices" value="1" />Option 1 <input type="radio" name="choices" value="2" />Option 2 This will display the text on the same line as the radio buttons. That's why I said that I would have preferred that <legend> allow block content, for fallback, but it's too late to debate that now. >Using an XML browser that can expand/collapse the tree (most of those I have >seen) the legend will appear as one of the things in the fieldset (the >others being radio buttons, and possibly labels as well), and it can opf >course be controlled by CSS as well. Most *browsers* don't expand and collapse the tree; just editors. MSIE, confronted with an XML document *and no stylesheet*, will present a tree view, but this isn't the intended usual mode of operation. -Chris -- Christopher R. Maden, Solutions Architect Yomu: <URL:http://www.yomu.com/> One Embarcadero Center, Ste. 2405 San Francisco, CA 94111
Received on Sunday, 2 July 2000 18:50:32 UTC