- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:22:25 -0500
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>, "Web Accessibility Initiative" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Yes, I know the definition uses the word "significant", and when not among the choir, I tow the party line on this. Still, aside from the linearlized table issue (which IMHO should be P1 anyway) could you please give me a few real world examples (hypothetical even) where addressing a P2 checkpoint or two makes a real difference? Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 5:09 PM > To: Bruce Bailey > Cc: Kynn Bartlett; Web Accessibility Initiative > Subject: Re: Definitions (Was RE: WAMM! -- I-Can Online) > > Actually I agree with Kynn. The priority scheme says that if you > don't meet > level-A there are some group or groups of people who are not able > to access > the content. Priority 2 - double-A - includes all the things that are > important to remobing barriers which put some people at a significant > disadvantage in trying to access content.
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 17:25:28 UTC