- From: Joel Sanda <joelsanda@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:44:02 -0800 (PST)
- To: W3C/WAI <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi; I've got some questions (well, alright, problems:) with WCAG 6.3. Wondering if anyone can shed some light on that requirement for me. 1. Since no browser supports all WCAG requirements, it's impossible to build a site that is 100% compliant with all WCAG levels AND functions in all browsers. 2. Since the best support for the WCAG lies in Internet Explorer 4.x, it seems logical most people looking for an accessible site will hit it in IE4.x. This is born out by my research of screen readers. JAWs is the most popular, and that runs with IE4.x or higher. HomePage Reader requires a 4.x version of Netscape. 3. Give 1. and 2., I argue that the scripting requirement 6.3 is far too restrictive. In my environment, we rely on JavaScript to ensure forms are filled out correctly and the database doesn't get cluttered with incorrect information. In fact, anyone using a database and a form will probably use JavaScript to ensure forms are filled out correctly. Imagine the chaos with eCommerce if a site couldn't ensure it's users entered data correctly. This site would be accessible, but one mistake and the user is out of their money, the product, and the vendor and shopper have to solve a problem that could have been prevented with JavaScript. That in and of itself is an aid to accessibility: it gives people two chances to fill out forms - their data entry pass and the verification pass. Usually, the JavaScript error checking gives more detailed information to the user if there is an error. I know there's the component of "universal accessibility", but IMHO #6.3 is just far too restrictive for most companies to consider. Thoughts? Am I missing the boat on this one? Thanks! Joel Sanda joelsanda@yahoo.com ===== Joel Sanda Rocky Mountains | United States --------------------------------- joelsanda@yahoo.com | Yahoo! Messenger: joelsanda --------------------------------- Nature is indifferent to our love, but never unfaithful - Edward Abbey __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 16:44:04 UTC