- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 06:56:30 -0500
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>, "Bruce Bailey" <bbailey@clark.net>, WAI Interest Group Emailing List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Kynn, I realize it can be hard to define something that already ingrained in your brain. Would you give a few examples of images which need ALT text, a title, and a long description, and say what all those should be? Then we can look at the experience of a blind and a sighted person with those pieces of info. Len At 02:49 PM 2/25/00 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote: >At 02:38 PM 2/25/2000 , Leonard R. Kasday wrote: > >Kynn, > >What are you saying the purpose of a title other than the circular > explanation that it's to > > > provide -- ta da -- a "title." > >The HTML 4.01 spec http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.4.3 > doesn't define it. > >I agree that it's undefined. Which is why we need to look at the >natural language definition of "title" -- and nearly any appropriate >definition I can think of would -not- include "and we'll get >back to you!" (or whatever it was) as an appropriate "title." > > >I'm saying now matter how titles are rendered, it's frequently > poor style, for the title of an image to redundantly express what's in > that image. Therefore, it's not enough to make only the title available > to a blind user. You've got to make both ALT text and the Title > available. Does your definition of Title contradict that? > >No, but it does mean that you use title to indicate, well, a title. > >The only times _I_ use title are when it's not clear, from the >other content (text and/or ALT text), what the link will do. >Therefore, I title the link appropriately. > >If it -is- clear, then I believe TITLE can (and should) be excluded. > > >If you agree with the bottom line, that both pieces of info need to > available, then I'd consider that for all practical purposes we're in > agreement. > >If they exist, then clearly they need to be available in some way, >yes. > > >However, you're right. I should have been more careful wording > >"My understanding is that Title is what's supposed to pop up for sighted > folks. " > >I should have said > > visual browsers frequently display the title as a "tool tip" > (a short message that appears when the pointing device pauses over an object). > >That's a quote from the HTML 4.01 spec BTW. <grin> > >Fair enough. Although I think the HTML 4.01 spec is poorly written >at that point; in any case, it's explaining common usage, and is not >necessarily providing this as a formal recommendation in my opinion. > >If that's the goal, then I think HTML 4.01 spec needs correction; >TITLE should not be -equated- with TOOLTIP. > >(Again, TOOLTIP attribute doesn't exist, but it -could- as part of >an XHTML module.) > >-- >Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org >President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ >AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/ ------- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2000 11:12:48 UTC