- From: Karl Ove Hufthammer <huftis@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:50:59 +0100
- To: "WAI Interest Group Emailing List" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org> To: "Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo" <sinarmaya@retemail.es> Cc: "Ann Navarro" <ann@webgeek.com>; "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>; "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>; "WAI Interest Group Emailing List" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 11:24 PM Subject: RE: ABBR vs. ACRONYM > Acronym and abbreviation add something very important that is completely > lacking in span - information about what kind of information is being marked > out (specifically, something that is an abbreviation or an acronym). > > If the two things are equivalent in HTML then there are a few > possiblities. One is to remove one of them, and in this case I would suggest > abbr, as the one less supported. I actually think removing acronym, as an acronym really *is* a type of abreviation. And if we (people on the WAI-IG list) can't agree on acronyms are and what's just abbreviations, I very much doubt "ordinary" people will understand the difference. Since abbr and acroynm will be rendered the same on all UAs, I really see no reason to keep both in the HTML specification, especially since noone seems to know the difference (and the definition is not the same in various languages/countries). -- Karl Ove Hufthammer
Received on Monday, 21 February 2000 11:02:01 UTC