- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:19:12 -0500
- To: pjenkins@us.ibm.com
- Cc: WAI Interest Group Emailing List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
aloha, phil! while i appreciate your quote taking the developer's practical view on this.unquote, determining whether or not to use ABBR (or recommend its use) based solely on current UA implementation is the wrong approach... new features of HTML 4.0/4.01 need to be stressed by authoring tools and in authoring forums precisely in order to force the hand of UA developers to implement them.. it's a classic chicken and egg conundrum -- or, to put it even more obliquely, if an ABBR is defined on a page and no UA supports it's expansion, does it make a noise? yes, passing the validation test is but the first step, but when do we stop saying quote wait until user agents support x, y, and z before you add x, y, and z to your pages unquote, and begin to build the momentum that will force developers into supporting the accessibility features which the PF working group has worked long and hard to get included into W3C-generated markup languages? no, i don't know if it will work, since no user agents or screen-readers currently support switching languages in mid-stream, but unless those of us who are page authors begin to implement accessibility-oriented features such as ABBR, ACRONYM, and SUMMARY (for tables), what impetus do developers have to support these features? moreover, it isn't just a case of switching language in mid-stream -- the use of CSS pseudo-elements (as outlined in the UAAG techniques document) to demarcate an inline natural language change will benefit a wide range of users, and not merely users with disabilities... gregory. Phil wrote: >How do you know if either will work if no user agents support it? I >understand passing a validator is helpful to determine the approach, but >until someone implements it, who knows if it will work? > >I don't know of any product that supports either changing languages >mid-stream nor picking up the title attribute on the ABBR element. And, in >this simple case it doesn't make a difference anyway does it? LEADER >pronounced in English or Spanish is about the same. I hope somewhere else >on the page it is explained in plain Spanish that LEADER is the >abbreviation for "Programa Europeo de Desarrollo Rural" > >I'm > >Regards, >Phill Jenkins -------------------------------------------------------- He that lives on Hope, dies farting -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763 -------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net> WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html> --------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2000 18:09:59 UTC