- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <jay@peepo.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 09:24:05 -0000
- To: <love26@gorge.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Accessibility has yet to be defined successfuly by WAI. It has 2 main barbs technology and people. When WAI and its members agree to make an effort to define these aspects please include me. jay@peepo.com Jonathan Chetwynd Special needs teacher / web accessibility consultant education and outreach working group member, web accessibility initiative, W3C ----- Original Message ----- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 9:34 PM Subject: [Fwd: [webwatch] How is access defined?] > Rather than posting this to GL, let's talk more about this here so we > can try to be clearer about the factors that go into framing an answer > to the very cogent questions Rick raises. > > -- > Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE > http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Saturday, 12 February 2000 04:48:04 UTC