- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <jay@peepo.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:28:47 -0000
- To: "Michael Burks" <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>, "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Cc: "Dick Brown" <dickb@microsoft.com>, "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@netcom.com>, "w3c" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
People with cognitive disability also benefit from text summaries and small images where bandwidth is limited. large amounts of text offer a poor solution to bandwidth where english is not the first language. small graphics are an enormous benefit in aiding comprehension. Michael Burks wrote > It(text only) might also be the best way to convey information to low bandwidth areas, > which includes a large portion of the world. > jay@peepo.com Jonathan Chetwynd Special needs teacher / web accessibility consultant education and outreach working group member, web accessibility initiative, W3C ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net> To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>; Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com> Cc: <dickb@microsoft.com>; <phoenixl@netcom.com>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 4:38 AM Subject: RE: New York Times web site > All, > It might also be the best way to convey information to low bandwidth areas, > which includes a large portion of the world. > > Sincerley, > > Mike BUrks > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Kynn Bartlett > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 11:38 PM > To: Scott Luebking > Cc: dickb@microsoft.com; phoenixl@netcom.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: RE: New York Times web site > > > At 08:19 PM 2/10/2000 , Scott Luebking wrote: > >That was the checkpoint I was referring to. However, my statement > >was not about text-only web sites, but web sites with parallel > >graphic and text-only web pages which the checkpoint strongly > >urges avoiding unless absolutely necessary. > > "absolutely necessary" is hard to define. > > Note, also, that it doesn't forbid the creation of text-only > sites for _non-disability-access_ reasons. For example, it's > possible that they think a text-only site is the best way to > convey their information or they're trying to cater to a Lynx > crowd. > > > -- > Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org > President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ > AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/ > >
Received on Friday, 11 February 2000 04:25:49 UTC