- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 21:48:20 -0800 (PST)
- To: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, phoenixl@netcom.com
- Cc: dickb@microsoft.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, Kynn Yes. You're absolutely right about the checkpoint. I was stuck in the disability access mode. Scott > At 08:19 PM 2/10/2000 , Scott Luebking wrote: > >That was the checkpoint I was referring to. However, my statement > >was not about text-only web sites, but web sites with parallel > >graphic and text-only web pages which the checkpoint strongly > >urges avoiding unless absolutely necessary. > > "absolutely necessary" is hard to define. > > Note, also, that it doesn't forbid the creation of text-only > sites for _non-disability-access_ reasons. For example, it's > possible that they think a text-only site is the best way to > convey their information or they're trying to cater to a Lynx > crowd. > > > -- > Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org
Received on Friday, 11 February 2000 00:48:27 UTC