- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:07:47 -0800 (PST)
- To: phoenixl@netcom.com, unagi69@concentric.net
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, Gregory Your response is kind of unexpected. First, the use of text-only versions means that the NY Times is out of compliance with the guidelines. Another interesting aspect is that your comment supports what I've been saying about the usefulness of multiple versions of dynamically generated web pages. It also points out that the guidelines may need to have different requirements depending on whether the web pages are created dynamically or not. Scott > aloha, scott! > > please let them know that the text-only slash low bandwidth version of > their site makes them the most accessible online newspaper that i've yet to > encounter.... > > overall, their web site (with a few significant holes, such as the magazine > section) is easy to use, and is quite a popular source of news for blind > users, especially those who use lynx... > > gregory.
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2000 14:07:59 UTC