- From: <thatch@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:12:18 -0600
- To: Glenda Watson Hyatt <Glenda@eaglecom.bc.ca>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
The best way to "respond" is to ignore them. The worst thing you can do is give them credibility by responding. They will not listen and just further twist your words. Jim Thatcher IBM Accessibility Center www.ibm.com/sns HPR Quick Help: http://www.austin.ibm.com/sns/quickreplace.html (512)838-0432 Glenda Watson Hyatt <Glenda@eaglecom.bc.ca> on 02/09/2000 03:09:02 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org cc: Subject: Re: Statements are now up Removing my professional cap for a moment...after reading Olson's statement, why do I have this undeniable urge to blindfold and stick this "expert" in a wheelchair, and say "go for it, buddy!" Replacing my cap...as serious professionals and business people, how do we best respond to these types of comments? Glenda Kynn wrote: > > The witness statements are now available at: > > http://www.house.gov/judiciary/2.htm > > I can't really express, in a public forum, as a representative > of the HTML Writers Guild, what I think of Mr. Walter Olson's > post which is full of "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt" mixed > in with broad generalities and blatant falsehoods in the service > of scare tactics. > > --Kynn ********* Glenda Watson Hyatt Soaring Eagle Communications "Creating freedom and power through accessible communications" E Mail: mailto:Glenda@eaglecom.bc.ca Website: http://www.eaglecom.bc.ca Want to know how to make your website accessible to more people? Subscribe to our FREE newsletter by emailing mailto:newsletter@eaglecom.bc.ca *********
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2000 18:11:45 UTC