- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 09:52:14 -0500
- To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: <specialreports@cnet.com>
The Disability Times story is on "Inaccessible Disability Websites and the Media". One example they critique is a mainstream eZine article I don't think got mentioned here: 1/26 by Sally McGrane "Is the Web Truly Accessible to the Disabled?" at URL: http://www.cnet.com/specialreports/0-6014-7-1530074.html First paragraph follows: <blockquote> Fifty percent of all Americans are online. That number may seem high, but not when compared to the 76 percent of Americans with disabilities who are online (according to the World Bank). Yet, despite these figures, approximately 98 percent of existing Web sites are inaccessible. That is, they aren't compatible with the tools that people with disabilities use to navigate the Web, such as text readers and text-to-braille translators. Until recently, site designers (who sacrifice compatibility for the sake of glitzy graphics) have largely ignored the disabled community. The launch of We Media and a recent push for accessibility on the part of the United States government herald a new movement to make the Web open to everyone. But there is still a long way to go. </blockquote> Article is short but includes several good links. It concludes with this telling note: > Editor's Note: CNET is among the 98 percent of Web sites that are not fully > accessible to people with disabilities. However, we are currently investigating > ways to make the main areas of CNET compliant with accessibility guidelines. -- Bruce B. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of David Poehlman > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:29 AM > To: wai-ig list > Subject: url for an article disabling access > > http://www.disabilitytimes.com/2000/01/31/editorial
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2000 09:54:29 UTC