- From: Neff, Robert <Robert.Neff@usmint.treas.gov>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:14:19 -0500
- To: "'Charles F. Munat'" <charles@munat.com>, Melinda Morris-Black <melinda@ink.org>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
In regards to your comment, the money is there. If the money is there then why doesn't the government webmasters see it? Because it has not been budgeted for that purpose and because the agencies do not know the money exists (and it really doesn't has because it hasn't been set aside by congress). If you want action you need to write your representatives who can do something, rather than complaining to the webmaster because they are at the bottom of the budget process. You want the webmasters on your side and they also have not been given proper training and education. All the laws in the world will not help you achieve an objective if you don't have buy-in from the people who will be doing the work - like the webmasters. -----Original Message----- From: Charles F. Munat [mailto:charles@munat.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 3:43 PM To: Melinda Morris-Black; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: Optimizing PDF files for Accessibility Melinda Morris-Black wrote: "Unfortunately, government agencies have reams of documents they are trying to make available via the Internet. Many were never digital documents. It is not economically feasible to hire the legions of staff necessary to perform the task of keying in the information in an era of budget cuts. "I agree that PDF technology as it stands today is seriously flawed in meeting the needs of the disabled. I posted the PDF links so that people would learn that Adobe is aware of PDF shortcomings and are making steps toward better accessibility. It is my hope that software makers build tools that help web developers create accessible sites." Reply: The only way that PDF technology can be made accessible is if it recognizes the text as text. If the PDF is simply an image of the original document (as many PDF files are, I think), then there is still no way to access that information except visually. To convert an "image" PDF to a "text" PDF requires the same OCR or transcription that converting it to a digital document would require. Unless Adobe includes OCR in Acrobat, accessibility will not be improved for "image" PDFs. And if Adobe did add OCR, how would that differ from current OCR software? If you are waiting for Adobe to make your documents accessible, you are waiting in vain. Frankly, while I sympathize with your problem, there is no solution other than OCR or transcription. Until government agencies are willing to face this and allocate sufficient funds to moving into the digital realm, a significant portion of the citizens of this country will be denied access to that information, effectively relegating them to second-class citizenship. Speaking as a citizen, I find this unacceptable. Instead of making excuses, I'd prefer it if you joined the ranks of people demanding that all documents made available be made available in an accessible format. The money is there. In fact, there is a multi-hundred-billion dollar surplus. That the government is more likely to cut taxes for the wealthy than to make documents accessible to everyone is a political reality, but it has nothing to do with a shortage of funds. It has everything to do with the status quo. I apologize if this seems harsh, but I, for one, have heard this excuse one too many times. I don't buy it, and neither should you. Sincerely, Charles F. Munat, Munat, Inc. Seattle, Washington
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2000 17:15:41 UTC