- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:37:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- cc: webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net, Rep.Charles.Canady@mail.house.gov, Web Accessibility Initiative <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Paul.Taylor@mail.house.gov
I am an Australian citizen, and rather proud of the way Australian law approaches accessibility (and interested to seee how it is played out in case law...). But I am currently sitting in an ordinary Internet cafe in Seattle, where half the terminals are text-only VT100 terminals and half are multimedia-capable Windows 95 or Macintosh G3 machines. I am about to be kicked off my line-mode terminal (there is a 60-minute limit when there are people waiting for them) and forced onto a multimedia terminal. This is not because there are people with disabilities, just through popular demand. It seems that the industry perception that accessibility is only for a very small group is just plain wrong, at least in this random (if statistically insignificant) sample. I can't claim to know much about the US constitution and how it applies, but I would be saddened to learn that it could be used to block a mandate for government to provide for all people, as I would be to learn that the people of the US were prepared to countenance large organisations discriminating against people on the bais of disability even idf it did prove legal to do so. So it is with interest that I watch the developments. Charles McCathieNevile (writing as a private individual) On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, David Poehlman wrote: I am not opposed to accessability at all, but what is at question here is not that accessability is enherently a bad thing but rather that enforcement of certain standards upon the internet commerce community is constitutionally sound. I reviewed the caselaw sited in the memo and It would seem that there is a clear mandate for a compilation of a legislative record on this as is suggested in the memorandum. I would not wish to see entities sued over the issue of internet accessability, at the same time however, I would not wish to see our hard won accessability squashed before it really begins. I will follow and be interested in the outcome of any proceedings on this. I'd like to site one place to look for information that can provide insite into what we are attempting to achieve with regard toaccessability which has been around and working hard since before all this started. http://www.anybrowser.org -- Hands-On Technolog(eye)s ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://poehlman.clark.net mailto:poehlman@clark.net voice 301-949-7599 end sig. -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell Street, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2000 20:37:59 UTC