- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <jay@peepo.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 10:26:43 -0000
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Joel Sanda" <joels@ecollege.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I visited your site and looked at your browser test area http://online.luc.edu/index.real?action=technical&baction=browsertest This is a very useful way of ensuring compatibility to your website. Some users may have problems with some requirements. I would like to recommend that you simplify it. Whilst users are proceeding with the browser test they do not need links to other parts of the site. You are not being productive with the real estate, users are unlikely to start visiting your site until they have completed the test. It would be clearer if each test provided a link dependent on its success or lack of. Ant that the means of contiunuation were consistent. eg Cookies yes : continue or Cookies no : continue with liks to: details for those interested At present every single page of ~6 has a different format eg click continue, click yes, click yes if else, click yes or no... I found this veryconfusing someone with cognitive problems, or new to computing, the client group for these pages, would have real problems. It is not necessary to show the behaviour of javascript, shockwave or real to indicate success, and seems to me to be confusing in your implementation. jay@peepo.com click on a letter or type a key word to find royalty free images with links.
Received on Saturday, 8 January 2000 05:36:36 UTC