- From: Waddell, Cynthia <cynthia.waddell@ci.sj.ca.us>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 16:21:17 -0700
- To: "'dd-confcall@egroups.com'" <dd-confcall@egroups.com>, mediatalk@onelist.com, webwatch@telelists.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, jerrysorphans@aol.com
Private email I have received on my Digital Signature Bill Commentary have confirmed that my comments served as a wake-up call on this issue of accessibility. The commentary is posted at http://www.icdri.org/questions_about_electronic_signa.htm. I will be speaking in Japan next month at INET 2000 and for various forums and it will be interesting to hear what people think about the issue you are raising. Cynthia D. Waddell --------------------------------------------------- Cynthia D. Waddell ADA Coordinator City Manager Department City of San Jose, CA USA 801 North First Street, Room 460 San Jose, CA 95110-1704 (408)277-4034 (408)971-0134 TTY (408)277-3885 FAX http://www.icdri.org/cynthia_waddell.htm -----Original Message----- From: love26@gorge.net [mailto:love26@gorge.net] Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 6:58 AM To: mediatalk@onelist.com; webwatch@telelists.com; dd-confcall@egroups.com; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org; jerrysorphans@aol.com Subject: [dd-confcall] A Call to Arms(?) Two NYT headline descriptors today: "Without one disapproving vote, the Senate passed a final bill...allowing sign[ing of] contracts online with a click of a mouse." "Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. is developing an Internet-based... system that will link truck and rail shipments at the click of a mouse." Those of us working on training Web designers to provide accessibility often recommend as an exercise hiding the mouse in order to emphasize the importance of keyboard/alternate operations. Both of the above stories refer to undertakings that are very likely to be easily made accessible to PWDs and not the retrofitting nightmare we sometimes face. But it's not clear if their designers had accessibility concerns in mind during their processes. Here the significant things are whether we could have had any input to these sorts of landmark decisions by means of Scott's suggestion for some "yet another consortium" of technologists/DRMers or whether effective awareness of the fact that there are people who are (could be?) a very effective part of society if their inability to use a mouse weren't some kind of major liability. W3C has been in the forefront of standards-setting for the systems that promulgate the protocols used in all these efforts. The members who work on these matters are commited to accessibility, in most cases. Yet... Could it be that the attitudinal prejudices against PWDs are so deep-seated that only a complete rebirth of "we're all in this together..." is a prerequisite for these kinds of innovations to be inclusive in nature? The mediatalk list members try to achieve this by influencing newsfolks to, through heightened awareness/sensitivity, make the common language lead in the desired direction: get away from "confined to a wheelchair"; skip playing the pity card; command recognition of the untapped talent in the "disability community"; etc. Not just political correctness but simple humanity acknowledgement. The "Jerry's Orphans" are attacking the same problem by focusing on the peculiar outpouring of pity/guilt called the "telethon" in which organizations and individuals with a history of not hiring/respecting PWDs profess concern by pledging money to fund (mostly non-disabled) researchers working towards evasive "cures" while the "victims" are useful mainly as "poster children" to make the donations larger. Groups like Justice for All and ADAPT move in the political arena supporting things from demanding a statue of FDR in a wheelchair at his memorial to getting people out of institutions and into the community. As in most "wars" this one has certain "choke points" through which the "enemy" must pass. The Web is clearly such. Anything that affects the what/how of Webstuff, particularly the tools used to create/decipher it are extremely important targets. Posting to and learning from the Web must not be restricted to TABs. Any use of this medium must be undertaken with inclusion paramount. "Everyone, everything connected" must prevail. Brotherhood isn't perfect but the Cain/Abel thing and sociopathy can be overcome - particularly as we realize that we are all members of one another. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Missing old school friends? Find them here: http://click.egroups.com/1/5534/0/_/_/_/961250298/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Visit the Digital Divide Conference Call Web Site at: http://www.egroups.com/group/dd-confcall To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dd-confcall-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Received on Saturday, 17 June 2000 19:29:04 UTC