- From: Michael Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:15:06 -0400
- To: "Paul Davis" <paul@ten-20.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Paul, Bravo! And yours is well put as well! Sincerley, Mike Burks -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Paul Davis Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 5:33 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: WaitingForBob -- Selfish Reason for Accessibility Well put Michael Burks, If you are lucky enough to find a restroom large enough for disabled people, the odds are it is being used as extra storage space. I make this point, as it seems to me having followed this group for more than 6 months now, there are a few people that make valid points but too many times they get lost in the techno babble. To coin a well worn phrase "when up to your butt in alligators, it is difficult to remember the original objective was to clear the swamp" I would respectfully ask when did the list members last read the mission statement? Perhaps a better way is not to treat the symptoms, but attempt to cure the disease. To force an issue in law is to antagonize, however to educate is to enlighten. The people that should be targeted for building accessible sites are the young and next generation of web builders. Not the ' I love rotating gifs, Java and big images built in frames' brigade. Has anyone asked the question what is the average life span of a web page? To force a company to change a site by law is expensive for everyone and will be resisted. The extra costs will be added to the products or services. But to educate and have new or updated pages accessible as they go up, I believe is the way forward. err........is that me off the list now? Paul Davis
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 21:35:19 UTC