- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:30:03 -0400
- CC: Karl Ove Hufthammer <huftis@bigfoot.com>, "WAI Interest Group (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I agree with the below and comments about mark up but if you do use images we are full back to how to implement them. even with mark up, I get tired of hearing the characters and character strings when I am reading with my screen reader though. I actually favor for reading purposes that we use devision words for rules. if we are putting in a rule, why. answer the why. do it in an attractive way and you can actually do it in clearly visible text and make the alt a "". using hr is the same thing. while I'll hear it in some browsers, it makes more sense if just below it is the reason for it. even if it is page 3. Thanks! Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Bailey" <bbailey@clark.net> > To: "Melinda Morris-Black" <melinda@ink.org> > Cc: "WAI Interest Group (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:44 AM > Subject: Re: Tagging question... > > | Alan Flavell is brilliant and occasional contributes to this list. > The article in > | question, however, is NOT strongly oriented towards consideration of > the blind. For > | bullets and rules, use * and --- which have the advantage of not > usually being spoken > | by a screen reader, unless the user asks for it. > > I disagree. If you use bullets, you should use the 'li' element (in 'ul' > of course). If you want a rule, you should use the 'hr' element, > specifically designed for this. > > -- > Karl Ove Hufthammer -- Hands-On Technolog(eye)s ftp://poehlman.clark.net http://poehlman.clark.net mailto:poehlman@clark.net voice 301-949-7599 end sig.
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 22:29:32 UTC