- From: David Sheehy <dsheehy@mac.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:27:23 +1000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> >Anyone else worried about a trend towards an all-Flash web? I find the title of this mail funny. Flash has been touted as "The future" for the last two years. In reality it has already arrived, and in my opinion, peaked. I think Flash is "Like, sooo 1999". It is very good for visual designers, and served it's purpose well. However, it is quite limited, and authors are looking for more comprehensive tools. SVG (scalable vector graphics) is a better standard for Flash-like content. It hasn't been adopted yet, but it should be quite accessible, because it is text-based, not binary code like Flash. I think Quicktime has a lot more potential, and it's important to make sure Apple know how important accessibility is, so they can build such features into future versions of Quicktime. If this is done, it could be a perfect medium for talking books. Flash is very prevalent, and that is a worry. Authors have to realise that it isn't suitable for everyone, and alternatives should be provided. Macromedia has to attack this issue head on as they develop their software. Everyone concerned should write to Macromedia and Apple, and demand accessible Quicktime and Flash! David
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2000 21:30:29 UTC