- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I think you have indeed answered your own question. P1 means it is accessible - there is a reasonably common work-around. P2 means that it is not difficult to do the workaround (in very rough terms). The working group tended to very strict interpretation of the priority scheme in assigning priorities to checkpoints. Charles McCN On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Bruce Bailey wrote: Dear Group, I have what I initially thought should be an easy question. Should not using a picture of text (i.e., a .GIF image that contains nothing but words) be a WCAG P1 violation? Checkpoint 3.1 addresses this, but the language is not nearly as explicit as it could be: <Q>When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather than images to convey information.</Q> Even assuming that ALT content is used appropriately, this seems like a VERY significant obstacle. I would make the case that this should be P1 since someone with low vision would not be able to read the text since the "use larger fonts" option of the UA browser would be effectively disabled. One could argue that it is only P2 since the person has a couple of work arounds (but neither of which are very good): (1) Use screen magnification ($) which, of course, works on graphics as well as text. (2) Disable image loading, and use the features of the OS / UA to magnify the ALT text content. I am thinking of the little old lady who might be convinced to use an "internet appliance". Ease of use is a big concern, but even she can handle the "bigger/smaller font button"! Except it frequently doesn't seem to work! Hmmm, I may have answered my own earlier post where I inquired as to if any of the P2 checkpoints (aside from 5.3) made a real difference in accessibility... -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2000 11:46:51 UTC