- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 09:57:01 -0500
- To: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
this is well written and especialy the end applies to us all. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Y2K Results in DOS 6.22 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 09:25:44 -0500 From: "Lloyd G. Rasmussen" <lras@LOC.GOV> Reply-To: "Lloyd G. Rasmussen" <lras@LOC.GOV> To: BLIND-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU I wish I had sent this out a couple of days ago. I have a spare 386 PC at home, built by a local shop in 1992 with an AMI BIOS and DOS 6.22, which happily runs WP 5.1 Plus, and many other programs. I conducted my own Y2K test on it recently. I set its clock to a few minutes before midnight, December 31, 1999, then turned it off. Twenty minutes later I turned it back on. The time was correct, but the date was January 4, 1980, which is the first Saturday in the base year of those PC's. Date also prompted: "enter date, (mm-dd-yy): to which I responded "01-01-00". This set the date to January 1, 1980, which isn't much more helpful than January 4. Then, at the Date prompt, I tried to enter "01-01-2000" but it wouldn't take this entry, because it had a four-digit year. I next, from the DOS prompt, did a full command line: Date 01-01-2000 and it accepted this entry and properly set the clock. I turned the PC off and rebooted, and the correct date persisted. So now I know what to do to get that particular computer to be Y2K compliant. When we boot up, whether on Saturday, Sunday or Monday of the new year, we all ought to check the system time and date before doing much else. Windows 95 and 98 have a clock applet, available from Start, Settings, Control Panel, Date, which can be used to reset the date and time using your screen reader, arranged like the vertical wheels of a digital clock. If you shell out to DOS 7 from Win95, at least, it also seems to only accept two-digit years, so if you set your date that way, you may have to employ the procedure I outlined above. I expect many e-mail systems and web sites to be down for various amounts of time, at various times, this weekend. Please don't flood the listservs with "where's all the mail" messages. If there is any insanity, it shouldn't take more than a day or two for things to sort themselves out. But if you have your e-mail program sorting messages by the "date sent" field, you should check both ends of your mailbox lists, just incase some really** old or misdated messages come through from someone. Have a blessed new year. Lloyd Rasmussen, Senior Staff Engineer National Library Service f/t Blind and Physically Handicapped Library of Congress (202) 707-0535 <lras@loc.gov> <http://www.loc.gov/nls/> HOME: <lras@sprynet.com> <http://lras.home.sprynet.com
Received on Thursday, 30 December 1999 09:57:33 UTC