- From: Neff, Robert <Robert.Neff@usmint.treas.gov>
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:12:03 -0400
- To: "'jonathan chetwynd'" <jonathan@signbrowser.free-online.co.uk>, Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>, charles@w3.org, mburks952@worldnet.att.net
- Cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Sorry, but I can think of more than one reason to NOT support multiple browsers on an intranet. Security is number one! Design and rework is two - CSS is not forgiving on multiple browsers and even within two versions of the same browser. Three - IT capitalization and cost to support. Four - the way plug-ins are handled... -----Original Message----- From: jonathan chetwynd [mailto:jonathan@signbrowser.free-online.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 1999 2:42 PM To: Scott Luebking; charles@w3.org; mburks952@worldnet.att.net Cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Web Accessibility Myths and The Kynn Challenge (was: The reason to support more than one type of browser on an intranet include: Good practice. --- Special Needs within a corporation will require a different browser. Our college has a number of systems, not surprisingly. Apple's are used by some different thinking types apparently. Not all are networked, so some comms go via www. Jonathan Chetwynd jay@peepo.com Search the www with pictures at www.peepo.com Send us your links We value your comments
Received on Sunday, 24 October 1999 15:12:09 UTC