W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: San Francisco State University and the ADA

From: Michael Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 16:16:21 -0400
To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>, "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@netcom.com>
Cc: <phoenixl@netcom.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001501bf1813$501baee0$7b414d0c@computer1>
Seems to me that the best person to refer this to is Cynthia Waddell.


Mike Burks

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Kynn Bartlett
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 12:51 PM
To: Scott Luebking
Cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com; phoenixl@netcom.com; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: San Francisco State University and the ADA

Scott wrote:
> Hi, Kynn
> Here's what I pulled off a mailing list.
> > SFSU has filed a response to a physical access lawsuit
> > claiming the ADA is unconstitutional - claiming that
> > hte govt has no right to protect the civil rights of
> > persons with disabilities.
>                   There is a very good articel in the on-line version of
> Ragged Edge at: http://www.ragged-edge-mag.com/extra/edgextratitl2.htm
> details some cases that other states are filing to have the ADA declared
> "unconstitutional" and and interesting case claiming " states are immune
> lawsuits under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act". [...]

Hi, Scott, I read the article above but still don't see any info about
the SFSU's response? Not that I disbelieve you, but the email you quoted
didn't cite an authoritative source (it didn't cite any sources) so I
still don't know anything about this issue.

Received on Saturday, 16 October 1999 16:16:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:06 UTC