- From: <Lovey@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:43:44 EST
- To: coder@acnet.net, w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, jchaiken@mindspring.com
Perhaps we should ban body language too. ;) = "winking smiley face" In a message dated 1/15/99 4:33:34 PM, coder@acnet.net wrote: <<This suggests that there is nothing we can do about it. Of course languages grow and change (I presume you were being metaphorical in calling it a "living thing"). The question is, are "emoticons" helpful or hurtful to our language and our culture (whichever language and culture you happen to be part of)? I stand by my original contention that emoticons cheapen the language. And because I believe there is a strong connection between what we can express and what we can experience, I think that things that cheapen our language also cheapen our experience of life. And I think that we, as a society, are NOT helpless with regard to changes in our languages, our cultures, our ways of life. I vote for consciously choosing our behaviors after thinking about their ramifications. So far, I've not been too impressed with the laissez faire method of growing cultures (of people, that is... let's leave my refrigerator out of this). Why not take an active role? If I can boycott company A's products or company B's services, I can certainly boycott emoticons. I am all for changing and improving the language. That's why I don't like emoticons. I don't think that they are an improvement. But I appear to be in the minority on this subject.>>
Received on Friday, 15 January 1999 17:44:07 UTC