- From: Mike Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:06:09 -0500
- To: "Christine A. Quinn" <cquinn@stanford.edu>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Lynn Alford" <Lynn.Alford@jcu.edu.au>
I do believe search engines index alt tags, but they do not index images. Sincerely, Mike Burks -----Original Message----- From: Lynn Alford <Lynn.Alford@jcu.edu.au> To: Christine A. Quinn <cquinn@stanford.edu>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 1998 6:33 PM Subject: Re: Data needed for presentation >At 10:41 AM -0800 15/12/98, Christine A. Quinn wrote: >>Season's Greetings to the WAI list. >> >>I've put together a presentation for web folks here at Stanford to let them >>know of the resources available for ensuring accessibility. However, >>I wanted to quote some numbers to make the issue more real. >> >>I have tried to find some data on the web about visual impairment >>in the population and have been unsuccessful. Anyone know >>of a source, or have the data themselves? > >When doing the presentation, have you considered mentioning that some of >the most important vistors to a web site are effectively blind? The >various robots from search engines need accessible sites to be able to >index them. > >Fun for the day, do a search on "you need a better browser" in altavista to >have a brief look at some sites that have not considered their search >engine profile at all. > >Lynn > >lynn.alford@jcu.edu.au | More of your conversation would infect >Teaching and Staff | my brain. Coriolanus >Development | http://www.ultra.net.au/~alford/ >Game Review pages at http://www.ultra.net.au/~alford/games2.html > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 1998 00:07:10 UTC