W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1998


From: Chris Maden <crism@oreilly.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 12:43:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199811241743.MAA24255@ruby.ora.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
[Jamie Fox]
> I am confused why the US encryption laws would be a barrier.
> Couldn't lynx just use 64 bit encryption like the normal version of
> Netscape and Internet Explorer do?  It is only the strongly
> encrypted (128 bit) that you have to promise not to give to foreign
> drug dealers.

Netscape distributes a compiled binary.  (I don't believe Mozilla
includes SSL.)  Lynx is distributed as source; the difference between
64- and 128-bit encryption is, I believe, only a change in a constant;
exporting the algorithm itself (in machine-readable form) is illegal.

<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 1998 12:44:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:02 UTC