- From: Wilson Craig <Wilsonc@Hj.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:05:15 -0500
- To: "Craig Wilson" <cwilson@slip.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Dear Craig, Again, please include a COMPLETE sign-off in your posts to this list, with your e-mail and company name. I do not want people to get the two of us confused. This could cause a great deal of confusion as time goes on. Thank you for your time and consideration. Wilson Craig Marketing Manager/Webmaster Henter-Joyce, Inc. 1-800-336-5658 http://www.hj.com wilsonc@hj.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Craig Wilson Sent: Friday, November 20, 1998 4:32 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Dealing with Artistes > But I'm an artiste'! My work is purely graphical and > means nothing to someone is blind; they are not the > target audience for my gallery of visual artwork, and > so I don't need to be concerned with them. > >What do you feel is the best response to this -- or are they >right? > I suppose what could be said varies according to the particulars, but one response I have is that there's a way it's easy to leave out the social context of peoples' lives when we start talking about "disabled users," almost as though they live in some alien land without friends, families and colleagues whose abilities may differ from theirs. For example, take the case of someone who's blind who has a friend (with no vision disabilities) who's very interested in the culture of pre-Hellenic Greece. If that blind person found a graphically-rich site devoted to the subject and were given enough information about the graphics to have a sense of what was there, the site could be shared with the friend and their interaction might provide a broadened context in which both persons could appreciate the graphics more than either could individually. Regards, Craig Wilson
Received on Monday, 23 November 1998 09:04:38 UTC