- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 15:53:19 +0100
- To: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> FWIW, the W3C Validator is not infallible. Take, for example, the > following three URLs: > > http://www.w3.org/Press/1998/DOM-REC.html.ja > http://www.htmlhelp.com/ja/reference/html40/ > http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/entities/latin1.html > > These pages are all valid HTML 4.0, but the W3C Validator disagrees. (The > WDG HTML Validator [1] correctly declares these pages to be valid.) That's true, because the current W3C HTML Validation Service doesn't understand various character encoding schemes, such as ISO-2022-JP. We know that, and we are trying to internationalize the validator. Unfortunately, we haven't got the time to work on it so far ...
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 1998 09:53:28 UTC