- From: David Norris <kg9ae@geocities.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:56:14 -0500
- To: "Liam Quinn" <liam@htmlhelp.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> The problem is that the built-in validator isn't a real validator. In the Yes, you are correct. It is relatively accurate. It is far more accurate than not having any form of validator. My standard practice is to markup a document completely using CSE 3310 in HomeSite. When finished, I will run it through the W3C validator to catch any stray errors like missing or incorrect attributes, invalid entities, etc. I fix the errors then revalidate just to be sure. Not as pretty as having a built-in sgmls. However, usable. When in doubt, I refer to the W3C for the correct answer. It is a matter of knowing where to look when an error occurs. In my mind, W3C is always the definitive source. ,David Norris World Wide Web - http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/1652/ Illusionary Web - http://illusionary.dyn.ml.org/ <-- 02:00 - 10:00 GMT Video/Audio Phone - callto:illusionary.dyn.ml.org Page via mail - 412039@pager.mirabilis.com ICQ Universal Internet Number - 412039 E-Mail - kg9ae@geocities.com
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 1998 23:55:55 UTC